Entrepreneurial Methods – Phương pháp khởi sự kinh doanh

1. The Lean Startup

Find an example for a pivot or an minimum viable product from a startup.

“To improve is to change; to be perfect is to change often” – Winston Churchill

The most critical decision for an entrepreneur is to know when to stay the course vs. change direction.  I’ve spoke at length about how to deal with “The Entrepreneur’s Dilemma.”  Today we launched the new version of Docstocthat completes our 6 year evolution from a professional document sharing website to the go-to resource to start and grow small businesses.  In part we were inspired by some of the most famous business pivots of some of the most famous brands.  Here are fourteen extraordinary examples:

Twitter

The most legendary pivot in social media history is the transformation of Odeo into Twitter.  Odeo began as a network where people could find and subscribe to podcasts, but the founders feared the company’s demise when iTunes began taking over the podcast niche.  After giving the employees two weeks to come up with new ideas, the company decided to make a drastic change and run with the idea of a status-updating micro-blogging platform conceived by Jack Dorsey and Biz Stone.

PayPal 

PayPal has always focused on payments, but it has gone through many permutations. It was developed by a company called Confinity in 1999 to allow people to “beam” payments from their PDAs (handheld digital computers, such as the Palm Pilot, an early incarnation of the smartphone). After merging with a financial services company called X.com, PayPal became the preferred online payment system for eBay sellers, which propelled its name into payment processing fame.

Groupon

In 2007 Andrew Mason created a website called The Point, which was a “social good” fundraising site that ran on a “tipping point” system, where a cause would only receive funding once the pledged donations reached a certain number.  Mason started Groupon as a side project, which applied a similar “tipping point” concept to local deals: if enough people pledged to do an activity, they would unlock a discount on it. The Groupon project quickly eclipsed The Point in popularity, and became the daily deal tycoon we know today.

Starbucks

The coffee shop which now inhabits every street corner (and sometimes two on each street corner) did not always sell fresh-brewed coffee to customers. They started off in 1971 selling espresso makers and coffee beans, which Howard Schultz (current chairman, president and CEO) fell in love with on first taste. After his visit to Italy in 1983, Schultz was determined to actually brew and sell Starbucks coffee in a European-style coffeehouse, and transformed Starbucks into the nationwide java sensation it has become today.

Nokia

These days Nokia may be in need of another pivot, but we all remember the glory days when a large percentage of cellphone users sported a Nokia (usually adorned with a trendy plastic case). Nokia actually began as a Finnish paper mill in 1865; the second mill opened on the Nokianvirta river, which inspired the company name we know today. Nokia created a wide variety of products throughout the 20thcentury including rubber goods, electronics and telecommunications devices, and eventually their first mobile phone in 1992. They decided in the same year to focus exclusively on their mobile devices, and sold off all other divisions of the company.

Flickr

Flickr actually began as an online role-playing game called Game Neverending, where users would travel around a digital map, interact with other users and buy, sell and build items. The game also included a photo-sharing tool, which turned out to be one of the most popular aspects of the game. The company decided to leverage this photo popularity and pivot to Flickr, which was acquired by Yahoo! in 2005, and became one of its most beloved and successful acquisitions.

HP

Hewlett-Packard has shifted focus since it launched as an engineering company in 1947. It began by creating a slew of electrical testing products, including audio and signal generators, but in 1968 introduced the first large-scale personal computer. Personal consumer-friendly computers did not catch on until the 1990’s, when HP focused solely on getting Americans to buy home computers and diverged the production of their testing equipment into a separate company. Since then it has focsused mainly on computers and printing/scanning accessories.

Nintendo

We all know Nintendo for innovating and inspiring an era of mass-produced video games, such as Super Mario and Donkey Kong. However, the company existed several centuries before that, and dabbled in producing everything from playing cards to vacuum cleaners, instant rice, a taxi company and even a short-stay hotel chain (also called a “love hotel,” I’ll leave it up to you to figure out what that is). It was in 1966 that Nintendo started producing electronic games and consoles, which gained wide popularity over the following 30 years.

Instagram

Instagram is the most widely used photo app for iPhone, but many don’t know its origins. Instagram began as Burbn, a check-in app that included gaming elements from Mafia Wars, and a photo element as well. The creators worried Burbn had too much clutter and potential actions, and would never gain traction. So they took a risk and stripped all the features but one: photos. They rebuilt a version of the app that focused solely on photography—it was clean and simple, and clearly it paid off.

Wrigley

Wrigley didn’t always sell gum. In fact William Wrigley Jr. stumbled on the value of gum while giving it away for free. Mr. Wrigley Jr. moved to Chicago in the 1890’s and took up work as a soap and baking powder salesman. He got the idea of offering free chewing gum with his purchases, and the gum proved to be more popular than his actual product.  Wrigley went on to manufacture his own chewing gum brands, Juicy Fruit, Spearmint and eventually Doublemint. Today the company grosses billions in revenue and is one of the most recognizable brands in American history.

Avon

Avon is one of the most popular names in makeup, whose products are sold by beauty representatives throughout the world. It started, however, with a similar history to Wrigley. David H. McConnell was a traveling book salesman, and he realized that his female customers were more interested in the free samples of perfume that came with the books than the books themselves. He began recruiting women to sell his perfume product, believing they would be able to relate and sell to one another better than male salesmen.

Fab.com

Fab, a modern fashion site that pulls hundreds of millions of dollars in revenue annually, actually began as Fabulis, as a social network targeted towards gay men. Although their social site tanked, in their side jobs the co-founders had a knack for selecting products that customers liked, so they decided to take a totally new direction with Fab selling hand-picked home goods, clothing and accessories. Their sense of taste paid off, as Fab now has over 10 million loyal users and is on an upward trajectory.

Pinterest

This incredibly popular “pinning” social network pivoted from “Tote” which allowed people to browse and shop their favorite retailers, and sent them updates when their favorite items were available and on sale. The creators realized that the users of Tote were mostly interested in building “collections” of their favorite items, and sharing these collections with friends. Since its repositioning, Pinterest now has over 70 million users with approximately 80% of its users being women. While its pivot has been wildly successful in terms of user growth, Pinterest is trying to figure out how to get back to Tote’s ecommerce and revenue roots.

Suzuki

This automotive company may be best known in the U.S. today for their high-performance motorcycles and sports vehicles. But from 1910 to 1935 Michio Suzuki was best known as the inventor and purveyor of weaving loom machines that powered Japan’s silk industry. An inventor at heart, Suzuki started looking for other products to produce in the interest of diversification. Suzuki’s complete 180 might have even given the founders of Odeo and Twitter pause. In either case, it’s all quite tweet-worthy.

This article was researched and co-written by Rochelle Bailis.

2. Effectuation

Find an example for effectuation from the company world.

In a cutting-edge article, Saras Sarasvathy argues that entrepreneurial founders use two types of logic — causal and effectual.

From my perspective, causal logic refers to the process of business planning wherein the entrepreneur develops a business plan and then follows specific predefined steps to create a business. In this case the ultimate venture looks very much like the venture described in the business plan.

Effectual logic, on the other hand, uses experimentation, flexibility, and “pivoting” to develop a venture that often looks significantly different than the original conceptualization.

Effectuation is Necessary for Our Changing World

Certainly you can imagine that in a well-established industry with well-defined customers, competitors, business models and low dynamism, a causal process would work well. But – hello – we don’t live in such a world anymore.

Our world is replete with shorter and shorter

product life cycles, quickly changing business environments, unique business models, rapid product innovation, and novel distribution systems. “Well-defined industry” is a misnomer.

For example is the smart phone in the telecommunications, mobile computing, digital camera, information, software, mobile shopping, or social networking industry?

Pandora as an Example of Effectuation

Today’s entrepreneurs are more likely to effectuate which includes experimenting with a product or service, remaining flexible, and then pivoting as necessary. As an example consider Pandora.

Tom Gratsy notes Pandora was launched in early 2000 with a B-to-B business model to license the service to major search engines. But when that didn’t work out they pivoted and decided on a B-to-C model and then pivoted again in song prediction from a mathematical algorithm to a social, preference model.
Today, more than 20 percent of people over the age of 12 use Pandora. Yet, in order to cover escalating costs the company will have to find new ways to monetize the site…thus, suggesting a new pivot will be forthcoming.

The final note

Particularly in uncertain and dynamic markets an effectual process is more effective. Yet, in many ways the concepts of flexibility, experimentation, and pivoting are much easier for the start-up entrepreneur.

How then can the large existing organizations utilize an effectual logic? Well that’s a topic for another day….Corporate Entrepreneurship and an Effectual Logic.

Source: Entreprof.com

3. Founding with components

Describe the idea of ‘Founding with Components’ according to Faltin’s perspective!

4. Design thinking

What is the impact of thinking as a designer for new venture creation?

Assignment:

Entrepreneurial Interview

One of the entrepreneurial key activities is reflecting your gained knowledge on everyday life, by this meaning adopting the ‘thinking out of the box’ mentality, leave the building and get to the outside world and start interacting with other people.

Therefore, in this session we ask you to interview at least five (5) persons in order to get their opinions on entrepreneurship. You can conduct the interviews with students from your university, friends or family members.

Start asking questions, listen carefully and what is the most important of all: do not interrupt! Use our interview guidelines as a check list in order to ensure that the same information is collected from each interviewee. Feel free to personalize you interviewing style: you do not need to ask each question literally in the given order! Record your interviews or make notes according to their importance. Try to relate the answers to the content of the videos you have seen, especially the frameworks, if possible.

Start now and try to interview some students on the campus, some colleagues at work or some friends at home!

(Source: Openeurship Course 2015 – University of Koblenz Landau)

Introduction to entrepreneurship

1. 10 Myths about entrepreneurship method

Question: Which myths are the most surprising you, explain briefly?

Transcript:

In the mid-nineties, a former investment banker declared that he was going to become the world’s biggest online retailer. A university dropout tells us that he will show the consumers which products they want and then step by step revolutionizes the markets for personal computers, music and cell phones. In his student digs, a young man designs a comparison portal for female students, which is now the biggest communication platform in the world, connecting millions of people. And an author, who, by his own account, is hindered by dyslexia, becomes a pioneer of commercial space travel. Are Amazon’s Jeff Bezos, Apple’s Steve Jobs Facebook’s Mark Zuckerberg and Virgin Galactic’s Richard Branson extraordinary people? Are they soldiers of fortune? Magicians? Rare super-entrepreneurs who change our lives dramatically?

The purpose of research around entrepreneurship is to get to the bottom of this mystery and to explore the seemingly magical about successful entrepreneurs. Successful entrepreneurs are not necessarily male dropouts and secret geniuses.

No! The potential for entrepreneurship is in each of us. The entrepreneur we want to send on a journey into an uncertain future is female and neither a visionary nor a dropout. She doesn’t have much money either and no sudden brilliant idea that she puts into action purposefully.  And still, she masters the uncertainty like our super-entrepreneurs. Because she also uses the entrepreneurial method, consciously or unconsciously.

The entrepreneurial method? What’s that? If Alice were a manager she would ask herself: What are my goals and which means do I need to reach them? By contrast, the entrepreneurial method begins with the unique means a person already has. These consist of their identity, competences, and contacts. Beginning with these means, one imagines several possible goals to solve specific problems. It’s like cooking without recipe. The super-entrepreneur doesn’t choose a specific recipe and buys the necessary ingredients. No, instead, she could look what she can fine in the fridge and then makes up various kinds of possible creations! With entrepreneurship, it’s not the goals we focus on in the beginning but the means. By acting without a single, fixed goal, a Richard Branson is able to imagine a whole portfolio of goals and possible ventures. After all, he founded Virgin Records and Virgin Airlines before Virgin Classic.

What’s also important: Business ideas don’t originate in the shower, but develop in multiple numbers when applying the entrepreneurial method. The idea is the easiest part in the founding process. And waiting for the “right idea” can lead to waiting forever. Our entrepreneur is already equipped with everything she needs for founding a business. She just has to get going and design the future.

But there’s a lack of money! Not if Alice acts according to the successful method of the super-entrepreneurs. Even Jeff Bezos started on a shoestring and funded Amazon with his parents’ guarantees, supplier loans and overdrawn credits cards. In other words, with his available means. Instead of trying to define the expected return like a manager, our entrepreneur defines her affordable loss. Affordable in a financial, psychological, and social respect. Instead of going on vacation, she starts a venture. In small, explorative steps she employs the available means – her money, her time and other people’s trust. If she fails, she fails at an early stage and at acceptable costs for her. With her stock of means, her subsequently conceivable portfolio of goals and her affordable loss, Alice has all the prerequisites to embark on her entrepreneurial journey.

But wait! There are other people who are interested in Alice and her venture. Surely they want to steal her idea, so Alice shouldn’t talk about her goals under any circumstances! Wrong! What is she going to protect if she, herself doesn’t know exactly what it’s going to look like? She has to talk about her venture to extend her stock of means and her portfolio of goals. Unlike in management, entrepreneurship is not about a win-lose situation along the lines of “who gets the largest piece of cake”.

Neither is it about a win-win situation: “Let’s make the cake bigger together!” In the entrepreneurial present with an uncertain future, the cake has not event been baked yet. Those who want to join become partners, bring in their means and decide together which cake to bake the common shared goal. They negociate the future together and co-create the products.

By the way, don’t we need a business plan with a clear understanding of where the journey is headed? An itienary like that can be helpful, yes, but sometimes it prevents the journey to India from ending up in America, the promised land. So I’m sailing aimlessly in one direction or the other, depending on the wind? But entrepreneurship is a crapshoot! Granted, luck is one element in the formula of success. But if I act according to the entrepreneurial method, I improve my odds.

It’s about a learnable routine in dealing with the unexpected. Learnable? But aren’t you born to be an entrepreneur? After all, entrepreneurial success is rooted in the genes! Wrong! The entrepreneurial method of our super-entrepreneurs can be applied by any of us. Everyone has a unique stock of means. It’s what we make of it that determines the success. Entrepreneurs are made, not born. Even Richard Branson has had more failures than successes in his ventures. Success was only possible by learning from his failures, which prepared him for the uncertainty that awaits him on his journey in his space ship. Maybe Alice from the entrepreneurial wonderland will be among his first partners. Not as a passenger, but as a collaborator in creating the future of the world we live in.

Entrepreneurs aren’t prophets. They don’t have to predict the future. They create it.

Ready for your own entrepreneurial journey? Here’s a short summary:

First, entrepreneurship is not an extraordinary phenomenon, but lies dormant in each of us as an entrepreneurial potential to act.

Second, according to the entrepreneurial method, I start with the available means – who am I, what do I know, whom do I know – not with mystical goals of fictitious ideas. So, there’s no reason to wait!

Third, as an entrepreneur, I don’t submit my actions under one great idea. No! on the basis of my stock of means I constantly develop my imagination about various possible goals for the solution of specific problems.

Fourth, instead of an expected return, what do I want to earn, the “upside potential”, I define an affordable loss, the “downside potential” and ask: how much is it worth to me, how much can I afford to lose?

Fifth, (there are so many ideas); my stock of means is the most valuable I don’t keep my ideas secret, but exchange my goals on the basis of my means with others. The business idea is the cheapest thing in the entrepreneurial process. So,

Sixth, “co-creation” develops with the additional means and the new goals of the partners.

Seventh, business plans most likely do not reduce uncertainty, but surely prevent reaching unplanned, yet desirable goals.

Eighth, luck is a part of entrepreneurial success. But with the entrepreneurial method I turn the wheel of fortune more often.

Ninth, we’re not born as entrepreneurs but can learn to deal with uncertainty.

Tenth, if you co-create the future as an entrepreneur you don’t have to predict it.

Science has many parallels to entrepreneurship. Scientists also experiment to get to the bottom of something new or to create something new. Our entrepreneur “Alice” is called Saras Sarasvathy in entrepreneurship research. She is the discover of the entrepreneurial method. Other researcher contribute their means and goals to comprehend the phenomenon of entrepreneurship, where new things develop under great uncertainty. What will the entrepreneurial society of the future look like? Don’t wait for it – co – create it

2. Schumpeter, Knight and Kirzner

Explain the major differences between Schumpeter, Knight and Kirzner’s conception of Entrepreneurship?

3. Nine key frameworks

Which framework covers your current view of Entrepreneurship? Which one is the most surprising to you? Please explain briefly!

4. Definition of a Startup

What does ‘search for a business model’ mean? Give an example!

5. Lean Startup

6. Startup kids trailer